Tibetan Parliamentarian Warns Of China’s Two-Pronged Strategy: Control Of Faith And Future Generations of Tibet

On 21st August 2025, the 108 Peace Institute, in collaboration with Nowrosjee Wadia College, Pune, successfully hosted an extensive lecture on Geopolitics of Succession: India, Tibet, and China Relations. The session featured Mr. Dorjee Tseten, Member of the 17th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile and Asia Program Manager at the Tibet Action Institute, as the guest speaker. Over 300 students, along with faculty members and the college principal, attended the session. The college warmly welcomed Mr. Dorjee and the 108 Peace Institute representative.

Mr. Dorjee opened the lecture by establishing Tibet’s historical status as a sovereign nation prior to China’s occupation, highlighting its strategic geography, rich water resources, and long-standing treaties affirming its independence. He cited examples such as the 1913 Treaty with Mongolia, the 821–822 Peace Treaty with China, and the 1914 Simla Convention. He also referenced Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu to reinforce that India historically shared a border with Tibet, not China.

Beyond geopolitics, Mr. Dorjee emphasized Tibet’s profound cultural and spiritual connections with India, rooted in the Nalanda tradition and sustained by the Dalai Lama’s efforts to revive India’s ancient wisdom. Tibetans continue to revere India as the sacred land of saints and scholars, said the speaker.

He also recounted the Chinese invasion, the brutal suppression of Tibetan religion and culture, and the 1959 National Uprising that forced the Dalai Lama into exile in India. Despite immense suffering and the loss of over a million lives, the Tibetan community rebuilt schools, monasteries, and democratic institutions in exile. The Dalai Lama emerged as both a spiritual guide and a symbol of Tibet, advocating nonviolence, democracy, and universal human values globally.

Reincarnation and the Geopolitics of Succession

At the core of his lecture, Mr. Dorjee warned against China’s two-pronged strategy threatening the survival of Tibetan identity:

  1. Interference in Religion and Reincarnation:

Beijing asserts illegitimate authority to recognize the 14th Dalai Lama’s reincarnation. In 2007, it issued Order No. 5, granting the state exclusive control over all Tibetan reincarnations. By politicizing this sacred practice, China aims to control the head of Tibetan Buddhism, undermining the religion and Tibetan culture itself. Mr. Dorjee cited the 1995 abduction of Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, the 11th Panchen Lama, who remains the world’s youngest political prisoner, replaced by a state-approved Panchen Lama widely rejected by Tibetans.

  1. Erasure of Identity through China’s Colonial Boarding Schools in Tibet

China targets Tibetan children through colonial-style boarding schools, where children as young as four are separated from their families. These institutions deliberately sever linguistic, cultural, and religious ties, weakening Tibetan identity and assimilating them into the Chinese state system. This strategy seeks to erase Tibetan identity entirely, transforming children into Han Chinese and leaving future generations disconnected from their heritage. The number of Tibetan children forcefully enrolled in these state boarding schools is alarmingly 900000 (ages 6-18) and 100000 (ages 4-6).

Mr. Dorjee observed that these harsh policies underscore the Chinese Communist Party’s failure to win the hearts and minds of Tibetans over six decades of occupation. He highlighted the March 2008 uprising as a pivotal moment in Tibetan resistance, which inspired a new generation of activists both inside and outside Tibet. The protests, which spread across all three Tibetan provinces, he shared, saw hundreds of thousands of monks, nuns, farmers, students, and nomads participating, only to be met with brutal military crackdowns. He also noted that, according to the Freedom House report, Tibet remains one of the least free regions in the world.

Regional and Global Implications

Mr. Dorjee emphasized that the geopolitics of succession extends far beyond Tibet. The Dalai Lama’s spiritual influence spans the Himalayan belt—including Ladakh, Sikkim, Himachal Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh—as well as Nepal, Bhutan, Mongolia, Japan, Vietnam, and Buddhist regions of Russia such as Tuva, Kalmykia, and Buryatia. Beijing’s attempt to control the future Dalai Lama could reshape Tibetan Buddhism and the wider Buddhist world.

He highlighted the Dalai Lama’s landmark declaration on 2nd July 2025, asserting that the Gaden Phodrang Trust alone has the authority to recognize future reincarnations—a direct rebuke to China. The announcement drew over 100 international media outlets and marked a pivotal moment in the global discourse on Tibet’s future.

In terms of exploring the long-term impact on India, Mr. Dorjee explained that China’s control over the Dalai Lama’s succession is not just a religious matter but a strategic move to expand influence across the Himalayan “Five Fingers,” with Tibet as the palm. Tibet’s forced assimilation into a centralized authoritarian state has weakened its historic, cultural, and spiritual ties with India, undermining India’s moral and cultural leadership in the region. China’s cultural and demographic engineering along border areas like Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh—including Han settlement, language restrictions, and administrative restructuring—reinforces territorial claims while reshaping local societies. These moves threaten indigenous identities and pose long-term strategic challenges to India’s regional influence.

Security Implications for India

The speaker extensively explained the security implications for India after its immediate neighbor was occupied by China. He said that China’s occupation of Tibet has turned India’s 3,488 km northern frontier into a tense Sino-Indian border. Mao’s “Five Fingers” strategy continues to influence Chinese expansion in Ladakh, Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan, and Arunachal Pradesh, including critical areas like Doklam. China’s claims over Arunachal Pradesh, border infrastructure projects, and the China-Pakistan alliance through CPEC amplify India’s strategic concerns. Mr. Dorjee cited reports of Chinese “border villages” and Tibetan youth recruitment in the PLA, although Tibetan recruitment remains limited.

Despite losing Tibet as a geographic buffer, Tibetans continue to act as a “spiritual buffer,” preserving cultural and religious ties with India, he reaffirmed. Mr. Dorjee paid tribute to the late Mr. Nyima Tenzing and 19 Indian soldiers who sacrificed their lives in the Galwan clash, underscoring the enduring human cost of these geopolitical challenges.

The speaker also expressed concern over China’s construction of the largest hydropower dam in Tibet to meet its industrial needs. He noted that the project not only threatens local biodiversity and Tibetan communities but also poses significant risks to downstream countries such as India and Bangladesh. Quoting Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu in an interview with PTI, he highlighted that the dam could pose an existential threat to local tribes and their livelihoods, warning that ‘China could even use this as a sort of water bomb’.

The session sparked lively interest, with over 50 questions from geopolitics enthusiasts. Due to time constraints, Mr. Dorjee addressed seven key queries, covering topics such as the functioning of Tibet’s democratic system in exile, the impact on India-China trade relations, and potential avenues for India to support Tibet’s independence, offering insightful perspectives to the audience.

In conclusion, the speaker emphasized that to truly understand China, Indian counterparts should study Tibet, as Tibetans possess firsthand experience of life under China’s harsh occupation.

partnership requests

Career and internship

General Inquiries

Tsering Youdon

Program Manager

Tsering Youdon is the Program Manager at 108 Peace Institute. She has 6 years of experience as a project officer and program coordinator in the Central Tibetan Administration’s Nepal branch. Her expertise includes planning, designing, and monitoring projects and supporting the capacity building of local organizations and individuals. Tsering is an MBA graduate from Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) in New York.

Tenzin Donzey

Program Manager

Tenzin Donzey is a Program Manager at the 108 Peace Institute. She has served in the Department of Information and International Relations (DIIR), Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) as a Project Officer and Tibet Support Groups’ Liaison Officer. Tenzin has extensive experience in planning, designing, and managing programs. She is a recipient of the Tibetan Scholarship Program under which she obtained an MBA from Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), New York.

Dr Lobsang Sangay

Founder and President

Lobsang Sangay is a Senior Visiting Fellow at East Asian Legal Studies Program, Harvard Law School. He was a democratically elected Sikyong (President) of the Central Tibetan Administration and served two terms (2011-21). Lobsang completed his BA and LLB from Delhi University. He did his LLM ’95 and SJD ‘04 from Harvard Law School and received the Yong K. Kim’ 95 Memorial Prize for excellence in dissertation and contributions to the understanding of East Asia at the Harvard Law School. While at Harvard, akin to track III, he organized seven rounds of meetings/conferences between Tibetan, Western, and Chinese scholars, most notably, the first-ever meeting between HH the Dalai Lama and Chinese scholars and students.

སྤྱིར་བཏང་གི་འདྲི་རྩད།

ལས་ཀ་དང་ཉམས་གསོག

མཉམ་ལས་ཀྱི་རེ་འདུན།

Lobsang Dakpa

Operations Director

Lobsang Dakpa currently serves as the Operations Director of the 108 Peace Institute. He was a democratically elected Member of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2016 to 2021. Lobsang holds a BA and LLB, having studied at the National Law School of India University in Bengaluru and JSS Law College in Mysuru. He also earned his LLM from Christ University, Bengaluru. From 2015 to 2016, he worked as a senior Chinese-language reporter for Voice of Tibet. He is a founding member of the Tibetan Legal Association (TLA), where he served as General Secretary from 2013 to 2016 and was later elected as President, serving from 2016 to 2022. Throughout his career, Lobsang has provided legal awareness and education to thousands of Tibetans and non-Tibetans across settlements, monasteries, and schools. He has also offered free legal assistance to many individuals in need. During his term in Parliament, he was invited to participate in numerous national and international conferences, representing the Tibetan community and advocating for justice and human rights.

洛桑扎巴

运营总管

洛桑扎巴目前担任108和平研究院的运营总监。他曾于2016年至2021年间,作为民选代表在西藏人民议会任职。 洛桑拥有文学学士(BA)和法学学士(LLB)学位,曾就读于印度班加罗尔国家法学院(National Law School of India University)和迈索尔JSS法学院(JSS Law College)。他还在班加罗尔基督大学(Christ University)获得了法学硕士(LLM)学位。 2015年至2016年期间,他曾担任“西藏之声”电台的资深中文记者。他是西藏法律协会(Tibetan Legal Association, TLA)的创始成员之一,并于2013年至2016年担任该协会的秘书长,随后于2016年至2022年担任会长。 在其职业生涯中,洛桑致力于为西藏定居点、寺院和学校的成千上万名藏人及非藏人提供法律知识普及和教育。他还为许多有需要的人士免费提供法律援助。 在其议员任期内,他受邀参加了众多国内外会议,代表藏人社区发声,积极倡导正义与人权。

བློ་བཟང་གྲགས་པ།

ལག་བསྟར་སྤྱི་ཁྱབ་འགན་འཛིན།

བློ་བཟང་གྲགས་པ་ནི་༡༠༨ཞི་བདེ་ལྟེ་གནས་ཀྱི་ལག་བསྟར་འགན་འཛིན་ཡིན།ཕྱི་ལོ་༢༠༡༦ནས་༢༠༢༡དབར་ཁོང་གིས་བོད་མི་མང་སྤྱི་འཐུས་ཀྱི་ཕྱག་ལས་གནང་།ཁྲིམས་ལུགས་མཐོ་སློབ་ National Law school of India University, Bangalore དང་Mysore JSS Law School བརྒྱུདཁོང་ཉིད་་ཁྲིམས་ལུགས་རབ་འབྱམས་པ་ (LL.B) སློབ་མཐར་སོན། ཕྱི་ལོ་ ༢༠༡༤ ལོར་རྒྱ་གར་ཁྲིམས་ལུགས་མཐོ་སློབ་Christ Law School, Bangalore ནས་ཁྲིམས་ལུགས་གཙུག་ལག་རབ་འབྱམས་པ (LL.M) མཐར་ཕྱིན་པ་གནང་པ་མ་ཟད།ཁོང་ནི་བོད་མིའི་ཁྲིམས་ལུགས་རིག་པ་བའི་ཚོགས་པ་གསར་འཛུགས་གནང་མཁན་ཁོངས་ཀྱི་མི་སྣ་ཞིག་ཡིན་པ་དང་།ཕྱི་ལོ་༢༠༡༣ནས་༢༠༡༦བར་ཚོགས་པ་དེའི་སྤྱི་ཁྱབ་དྲུང་ཆེའི་ཕྱག་ལས་གནང་པ་དང་།ཕྱི་ལོ་༢༠༡༥ནས་༢༠༡༦དབར་ལོ་གཅིག་རིང་ནོར་ཝེ་བོད་ཀྱི་རླུང་འཕྲིན་ཁང་གི་རྒྱ་སྐད་གསར་འགོད་པ་རྒན་པའི་ཕྱག་ལས་གནང་ཡོད།ཕྱི་ལོ་༢༠༡༦ནས་༢༠༢༢དབར་བོད་མིའི་ཁྲིམས་ལུགས་རིག་པ་བའི་ཚོགས་པའི་ཚོགས་གཙོའི་ཕྱག་ལས་གནང་པ་རེད།དུས་ཡུན་དེ་དག་གི་རིང་།ཁོང་གིས་བཙན་བྱོལ་བོད་མིའི་དགོན་སྡེ་ཁག་དང་སློབ་གྲྭ་ཁག།གཞིས་ཆགས་ཁག་ཏུ་བསྐྱོད་ནས་བོད་མི་ཁྲི་སྟོང་མང་པོ་ལ་ཁྲིམས་ལུགས་ཀྱི་གོ་རྟོགས་སྤེལ་པ་མ་ཚད།ཁྲིམས་དོན་གྱི་དཀའ་ངལ་འཕྲད་པའི་བོད་མི་རྒྱ་ཕྲག་མང་པོ་ལ་ཕྱག་རོགས་གནང་ཡོད།ཁོང་གིས་བོད་མི་མང་སྤྱི་འཐུས་ཀྱི་ཕྱག་ལས་གནང་ཡུན་རིང་།རྒྱལ་ནང་དང་རྒྱལ་སྤྱིའི་ཚོགས་སྡེ་འདྲ་མིན་ཀྱིས་གདན་ཞུས་གནང་ཏེ་བརྗོད་གཞི་འདྲ་མིན་ཐོག་ཚོགས་འདུ་ཆེ་ཆུང་མང་པོ་ལ་ཆ་ཤས་གནང་ཡོད་པ་རེད།